Abductive Grounded Theory: An Educational Framework for Teaching Theory Generation

Authors

  • Wolfgang Amann* University of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61360/BoniCETR262020400702

Keywords:

Abductive Grounded Theory, abductive reasoning, theory generation, doctoral education, qualitative research methods

Abstract

Grounded Theory is one of the most widely taught qualitative research methodologies in doctoral education and is commonly presented as an inductive approach to theory generation. While this emphasis has provided researchers with valuable analytical procedures, comparatively little explicit attention has been devoted to the reasoning through which qualitative theories are developed. This conceptual theory-building article argues that research methods education can be strengthened by making abductive reasoning more explicit within Grounded Theory. Building on scholarship in Grounded Theory, abductive reasoning, theorising, and doctoral education, it proposes Abductive Grounded Theory (AGT) as an integrated conceptual framework for teaching the generation of qualitative theory. AGT conceptualises theory generation through five epistemic capabilities that describe the cognitive work of abductive inquiry and six methodological design principles that operationalise these capabilities within qualitative research. Rather than introducing abductive reasoning as a new methodological principle, AGT integrates and extends existing scholarship by translating previously dispersed ideas into a coherent pedagogical and methodological framework for doctoral education. The article discusses the implications of this framework for teaching research methods and doctoral supervision, and outlines directions for future research on theorising, researcher cognition, and AI-supported qualitative inquiry. In doing so, it contributes to contemporary debates on doctoral education by reframing theory generation as an explicit, teachable capability and offering a structured framework to make the logic of qualitative discovery more transparent.

Author Biography

  • Wolfgang Amann*, University of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

    Wolfgang Amann is a postgraduate researcher at the University of Gloucestershire, where he investigates coach–coachee compatibility in first-time Ironman preparation.

References

Amann, W. (2026). Abductive Grounded Theory - Rethinking grounded theory as a logic of discovery. Walnut.

Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press.

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26.

Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 293–304.

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.

Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Sage.

Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 207–221.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Reichertz, J. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214–228). Sage.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.

Swedberg, R. (2014). The art of social theory. Princeton University Press.

Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press.

Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.

Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Abductive Grounded Theory: An Educational Framework for Teaching Theory Generation. (2026). Contemporary Education and Teaching Research, 7(7), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.61360/BoniCETR262020400702

Similar Articles

1-10 of 321

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.