Study on the Interaction between Changes in the Governance System of Universities and the Development of Students' Sociology-Emotional Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61360/BoniGHSS252018840601Keywords:
university governance system, sociology-emotional competence, interaction, synergistic development, talent cultivationAbstract
In the process of modernization of higher education, the change of university governance system and the development of students' sociolect-emotional competence have gradually become the two core propositions of education reform. The change of governance system affects the growth ecology of students through institutional restructuring, power allocation and cultural reshaping, while the cultivation of students' sociolect-emotional competence (including the dimensions of self-knowledge, social awareness, interpersonal relationship management, responsible decision-making, etc.) in turn promotes the optimization and innovation of the governance system. Based on organizational change theory and sociolect-emotional learning theory, this paper constructs an interactive analytical framework of "governance structure-educational practice-competence development" by investigating the reports on the operation of three high-level universities, and reveals the dynamic correlation mechanism between the two through a mixed research method. The study finds that changes in the governance system significantly affect the development of students' sociolect-emotional competence through curricular innovation, participatory governance, and evaluation reform, while the improvement of students' competence feeds into the effectiveness of governance through the mechanisms of subjectivity awakening and organizational citizenship behavior. The findings of the study provide theoretical support and practical insights for the modernization of higher education governance and the comprehensive development of students.
References
Lee, J. (2024). The role of teachers' social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi. School Psychology International, 45(6), 681–698.
Augusto, A. P., & Alejandro, P. G. (2024). Geomorphology of the Courel Mountains UNESCO Global Geopark (Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula). 2024.
Arnone, M., et al. (2023). Environmental perspective of decarbonization actions in the Italian UNESCO site of the Vineyard landscape of Piedmont Region. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 18(1).
Friedman, S. R., Guerrero, M. A., McAllister, R. R., et al. (2020). Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective. Land Use Policy, 97.
Mozaffarian, D., Agarwal, M., Aggarwal, M., et al. (2025). Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: A joint advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2025.
Márcia, C., & Isabel, M. (2022). Universitas: How do students perceive university social responsibility in three European higher education institutions? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(4), 767–782.
Benson, K. N. S. (2024). School communities of strength: Strategies for educating children living in deep poverty. 118(4), 408–409.
Frye, K. E., et al. (2024). Content analysis of the CASEL framework using K-12 state SEL standards. School Psychology Review, 53(3), 208–222.
OECD. (2018). OECD competition assessment reviews: Portugal: Volume II – Self-regulated professions. OECD Publishing.
Technical University of Berlin. (2020). Scaling limits for super-replication with transient price impact. Journal of Mathematics, 2020, 808.
Gomez, R. A., Byun, R. H., Wu, S., et al. (2025). Boosting angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in microglia protects against Alzheimer's disease in 5xFAD mice. Nature Aging, 2025.
Daphne, B. (1999). Where the world ended: Re-unification and identity in the German borderland. University of California Press.
Leslie, L. L., Slaughter, S., Taylor, J. B., et al. (2012). How do revenue variations affect expenditures within U.S. research universities? Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 614–639.
Hermien, M. L., Gh, M. L., et al. (2019). Substituting physicians with nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses in nursing homes: A realist evaluation case study. BMJ Open, 9(5), e028169.
Levin, O., & Segev, Y. (2023). The missing piece in the CASEL model: The impact of social-emotional learning on online literature teaching and learning. Education Sciences, 13(11).
Durlak, J. A., et al. (2022). What we know, and what we need to find out about universal, school-based social and emotional learning programs for children and adolescents: A review of meta-analyses and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11–12), 765–782.
Ser, Z., & Sobota, M. R. (2024). Proteome integral solubility alteration via label-free DIA approach (PISA-DIA), game changer in drug target deconvolution. Proteomics, 25(3), e2400147.
Cristol, D., & Anderman, E. M. (2022). Confronting contemporary controversies in education. Theory Into Practice, 61(4), 359–361.
Dan, T. (2025). The content and implementation pathways of adversity quotient (AQ) enlightenment education in family education. Journal of Research in Vocational Education, 7(2), 53–56.
Jones, D., Hall, S., Tinney, G., et al. (2025). Listening to young children's voices: Reflections and impact on policy, practice and a sustainable future. Taylor & Francis.
Trowler, P. (2013). Can approaches to research in art and design be beneficially adapted for research into higher education? Higher Education Research & Development, 32(1), 56–69.
Kehm, B. M. (2023). International developments in doctoral education: Case study Germany. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 668–676.
Barnes, J. (2020). Collegial governance in postwar Australian universities. History of Education Review, 2020, 149–164.
Frédéric, D., Dany, D., François, J. L., et al. (2022). A probabilistic seabed-ice keel interaction model. The Cryosphere, 16(5), 1963–1977.
Jones, A. D. (2025). Integrating STEM education in sustained deep rural schools: Innovative strategies for multi-grade, multi-subject classrooms. Frontiers in Education, 2025.
Cristache, S., Serban, D., & Vuta, M. (2015). An analysis of the Romanian higher education system perspectives using quantitative techniques. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 53–57.
Ueasin, N. (2020). Decision-making on public transportation services based on the socio-economic, psychological, and environmental concern factors. The Open Transportation Journal, 14, 22–31.
Seo, J., & Qi, J. (2013). A multi-factor paradigm for multicultural education in Japan: An investigation of living, learning, school activities and community life. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1498–1503.
Frédéric, D., Dany, D., François, J. L., et al. (2022). A probabilistic seabed-ice keel interaction model. The Cryosphere, 16(5), 1963–1977.
Romain, R., Michel, T., Valérie, L., et al. (2022). In situ ESEM using 3-D printed and adapted accessories to observe living plantlets and their interaction with enzyme and fungus. Micron, 153, 103185.
Bery, S., Brandl, B. M. T., Jones, T. B., et al. (2023). Determining the presence and size of shoulder lesions in sows using computer vision. Animals, 14(1).
Smith, S., Benbenek, M. M., Meyer, S., et al. (2025). Diagnostic reasoning as a component of clinical reasoning in nurse practitioner education: Extension of a scoping review. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 36(2), 158–173.
Patricia, C., Bonny, K., B. B. P., et al. (2018). Difficult to doable: Interprofessional collaborative practice in distance education. The Journal of Nursing Education, 57(4), 225–228.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jin Lu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
