<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn media_type="print">2737-5374</issn>
            <issn media_type="electronic">2737-5382</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>BONI FUTURE DIGITAL PUBLISHING CO.,LIMITED </publisher-name>
            </publisher>
            <url>https://ojs.bonfuturepress.com/index.php/GHSS/article/view/2089</url>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <issue>5</issue>
            <year>2026</year>
            <published-time>2026-10-26</published-time>
            <title>Digital Disconnection as Leisure: Testing the DRAMMA Model's Recovery and Need-Fulfillment Pathways to Subjective Well-Being</title>
            <author>Hongfa Yi,Wenjing Wang</author>
            <abstract>Intentional digital disconnection is increasingly used to manage always-on media, but its associations with well-being and the psychological processes involved remain uncertain. This cross-sectional survey examines technology-based and non-technology-based disconnection among 703 Chinese university students using structural equation modeling. A study-specific adaptation of the DRAMMA framework distinguishes recovery-function from a need-related factor labelled need-fulfillment, comprising autonomy, meaning-related experiences, and affiliation. Both forms of disconnection were positively associated with subjective well-being, with standardized direct coefficients of 0.539 and 0.563. The need-related factor showed positive indirect associations in both models, with standardized coefficients of 0.157 and 0.214 and confidence intervals for the unstandardized effects excluding zero. The recovery-function indirect associations were not statistically significant. These findings identify different statistical associations under the proposed measurement specification. The cross-sectional design does not establish causal mediation, and the adapted indicators limit conclusions about individual DRAMMA dimensions. Longitudinal research and further measurement validation are needed.</abstract>
            <keywords>digital disconnection,subjective well-being,DRAMMA model</keywords>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61360/BoniGHSS262020890506</article-id>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <tbody>
        <back>
            <sec/>
            <ref-list>
                <ref>
                   <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                       <p>Agai, M. S. (2022). Disconnectivity synced with identity cultivation: Adolescent narratives of digital disconnection. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(6), zmac025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac025&#13;
Ansari, S., Iqbal, N., Azeem, A., &amp; Danyal, K. (2024). Improving well-being through digital detoxification among social media users: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 27(11), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0742&#13;
Baumeister, R. F., &amp; Vohs, K. D. (2002). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In C. R. Snyder &amp; S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608–618). Oxford University Press.&#13;
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., &amp; Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1&#13;
Chick, G. (1998). Leisure and culture: Issues for an anthropology of leisure. Leisure Sciences, 20(2), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409809512269&#13;
China Internet Network Information Center. (2025). The 55th statistical report on China’s internet development. https://www.cnnic.net.cn/NMediaFile/2025/0220/MAIN1740036167004CKE0DITFO1.pdf&#13;
Creswell, J. D., &amp; Lindsay, E. K. (2014). How does mindfulness training affect health? A mindfulness stress buffering account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 401-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547415&#13;
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper &amp; Row.&#13;
Culkin, J. M. (1967, March 18). A schoolman's guide to Marshall McLuhan. Saturday Review, 51–53, 70–72.&#13;
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542&#13;
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., &amp; Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13&#13;
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., &amp; Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y&#13;
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., &amp; Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000209&#13;
Fitz, N., Kushlev, K., Jagannathan, R., Lewis, T., Paliwal, D., &amp; Ariely, D. (2019). Batching smartphone notifications can improve well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.016&#13;
Fornell, C., &amp; Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312&#13;
Harmon, J., &amp; Duffy, L. (2023). Turn off to tune in: Digital disconnection, digital consciousness, and meaningful leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 54(5), 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2023.2220699&#13;
Hu, L.-T., &amp; Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118&#13;
Klingelhoefer, J., Gilbert, A., &amp; Meier, A. (2024). Momentary motivations for digital disconnection: An experience sampling study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5), zmae013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmae013&#13;
Kujanpää, M., Syrek, C., Lehr, D., Kinnunen, U., Reins, J. A., &amp; de Bloom, J. (2021). Need satisfaction and optimal functioning at leisure and work: A longitudinal validation study of the DRAMMA model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(2), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00247-3&#13;
Kushlev, K., &amp; Leitao, M. R. (2020). The effects of smartphones on well-being: Theoretical integration and research agenda. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.001&#13;
Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., &amp; Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 364–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508&#13;
Nassen, L.-M., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., &amp; Karsay, K. (2023). Opt-out, abstain, unplug. A systematic review of the voluntary digital disconnection literature. Telematics and Informatics, 81, Article 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.101980&#13;
Newman, D. B., Tay, L., &amp; Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x&#13;
Nguyen, M. H. (2021). Managing social media use in an “always-on” society: Exploring digital wellbeing strategies that people use to disconnect. Mass Communication and Society, 24(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1979045&#13;
Nguyen, M. H., &amp; Hargittai, E. (2023). Digital inequality in disconnection practices: Voluntary nonuse during COVID-19. Journal of Communication, 73(5), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad021&#13;
Nguyen, M. H., &amp; Hargittai, E. (2024). Digital disconnection, digital inequality, and subjective well-being: A mobile experience sampling study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), Article zmad044. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad044&#13;
Preacher, K. J., &amp; Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879&#13;
Ryan, R. M., &amp; Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141&#13;
Sonnentag, S., &amp; Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204&#13;
Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., &amp; Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80&#13;
Syrek, C. J., de Bloom, J., &amp; Lehr, D. (2021). Well recovered and more creative? A longitudinal study on the relationship between vacation and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 784844. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784844&#13;
Twilley, D., Morris, L., Holland, W. H., &amp; Holland, K. K. (2022). An examination of DRAMMA model outcomes for campus recreation users. Recreational Sports Journal, 46(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/15588661211047597&#13;
Vally, Z., &amp; D'Souza, C. G. (2019). Abstinence from social media use, subjective well-being, stress, and loneliness. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 55(4), 752–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12431&#13;
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa024&#13;
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., &amp; Nguyen, M. H. (2024). Digital media as ambiguous goods: Examining the digital well-being experiences and disconnection practices of Belgian adults. European Journal of Communication, 39(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231201487&#13;
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Vandebosch, H., Koster, E. H. W., De Leyn, T., Van Gaeveren, K., de Segovia Vicente, D., Van Bruyssel, S., van Timmeren, T., De Marez, L., Poels, K., DeSmet, A., De Wever, B., Verbruggen, M., &amp; Baillien, E. (2024). Why, how, when, and for whom does digital disconnection work? A process-based framework of digital disconnection. Communication Theory, 34(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad016&#13;
Vorderer, P., Hefner, D., Reinecke, L., &amp; Klimmt, C. (Eds.). (2018). Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276472</p>
                   </element-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </tbody>
</article>