<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Global Humanities and Social Sciences</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn media_type="print">2737-5374</issn>
            <issn media_type="electronic">2737-5382</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>BONI FUTURE DIGITAL PUBLISHING CO.,LIMITED </publisher-name>
            </publisher>
            <url>https://ojs.bonfuturepress.com/index.php/GHSS/article/view/2016</url>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <year>2026</year>
            <published-time>2026-06-25</published-time>
            <title>Negotiating Cultural Identity in the Digital Age: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Resource Integration Practices in a Chinese University Library</title>
            <author>Yu Chen,Kai Chen</author>
            <abstract>Purpose – The digital transformation of university libraries in China presents a complex terrain where institutional mandates for cultural education intersect with the affordances of emerging digital technologies and the rich tapestry of local heritage. This paper examines how practitioners navigate these intersections through reflexive, collaborative practice.  
Design/methodology/approach – Adopting a collaborative autoethnographic approach, this study critically examines a three-year initiative to integrate regional culture (e.g., Great Wall heritage) with institutional characteristics (e.g., metallurgical engineering legacy) in a Chinese university library. Data include narrative accounts, 33 semi-structured interviews, and participatory observation. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 12.  
Findings – Three core tensions emerged: (1) authenticity vs. accessibility in digitisation; (2) institutional narrative vs. local voice in curation; and (3) technological enthusiasm vs. user agency in interactive design. Successful integration is reconceptualised as ongoing negotiation rather than seamless fusion.  
Originality/value – This study contributes to LIS by theorising the academic library as a dynamic “cultural negotiation space,” highlighting the socio-technical complexities of heritage work in non-Western contexts. It challenges techno-optimistic models of digital integration and foregrounds relational, reflexive practice.</abstract>
            <keywords>university library,cultural heritage,digital integration,collaborative autoethnography,technological mediation,China</keywords>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61360/BoniGHSS262020160304</article-id>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <tbody>
        <back>
            <sec/>
            <ref-list>
                <ref>
                   <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                       <p>Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77–101.&#13;
Cameron, F. (2007), “Beyond the cult of the replicant: museums and historical digital objects—traditional concerns, new discourses”, in Cameron, F. and Kenderdine, S. (Eds), Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 49–76.&#13;
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F.W. and Hernandez, K.-A.C. (2013), Collaborative Autoethnography, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.&#13;
Ellis, C., Adams, T.E. and Bochner, A.P. (2011), “Autoethnography: an overview”, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 12 No. 1, Art. 10, available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108&#13;
Gorichanaz, T. (2020), “Understanding the information experiences of people engaged in the spiritual practice of lectio divina”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 76 No. 3, pp. 703–720.&#13;
Gorichanaz, T. (2021), “Autohermeneutics: a phenomenological approach to information experience”, Library &amp; Information Science Research, Vol. 43 No. 1, 101030.&#13;
Jaeger, P.T. and Burnett, G. (2010), Information Worlds: Social Context, Technology, and Information Behavior in the Age of the Internet, Routledge, New York, NY.&#13;
Jenkins, H. (2006), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York University Press, New York, NY.&#13;
McKenzie, P.J. (2021), “Critical information literacy and the ethics of knowledge organization”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 203–219.&#13;
Oldenburg, R. (1989), The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day, Paragon House, New York, NY.&#13;
Orlikowski, W.J. (2007), “Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work”, Organization Studies, Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 1435–1448.&#13;
Parry, R. (2010), “The end of the beginning: normativity in heritage information systems”, in Ross, S., Ashmore, G. and Warwick, P. (Eds), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities 2010 Conference, King’s College London, London, pp. 289–293.&#13;
Wang, L. and Liu, Y. (2021), “University libraries as sites of ideological governance in contemporary China”, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 601–613.&#13;
Zijlema, M. (2018), “Tactile memory: touching heritage in the museum”, Museum Management and Curatorship, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 487–503.</p>
                   </element-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </tbody>
</article>