<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Contemporary Education and Teaching Research</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn media_type="print">2737-4203</issn>
            <issn media_type="electronic">2737-4335</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>BONI FUTURE DIGITAL PUBLISHING CO.,LIMITED</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
            <url>https://ojs.bonfuturepress.com/index.php/CETR/article/view/2069</url>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <issue>9</issue>
            <year>2026</year>
            <published-time>2026-09-25</published-time>
            <title>Understanding Classroom Silence: A Cognitive-Decision Model of Reference-Point Dependence and Task Framing</title>
            <author>Baoxia Zuo*</author>
            <abstract>Classroom silence persistently constrains college oral English instruction, yet its cognitive mechanisms remain underexplored. Drawing on Prospect Theory, this study constructs and tests an integrated model linking reference-point dependence, task framing, and language proficiency to explain oral risk-aversion. Survey data from 541 non-English-major undergraduates were analyzed via structural equation modeling. Results show that (1) four reference-point types-peer comparison, self-expectation, cultural norms, and teacher specification-significantly predict risk-aversion, with teacher specification exerting the strongest effect (β = 0.876); (2) perceived teacher task framing partially mediates this relationship (54.7% of total effect); (3) task framing and reference-point dependence interact to form a "cognitive-situational reinforcement loop"; (4) multi-group SEM based on CET-4 passing status reveals that non-passers show stronger direct reference-point→risk-aversion paths, while passers show a stronger task-framing→risk-aversion path; notably, the teacher-specification→risk-aversion path remains stable across proficiency levels. These findings position reference-point dependence as a key cognitive driver of classroom silence and task framing as an actionable intervention channel, while proficiency-stratified sensitivities call for differentiated pedagogical strategies. This study offers a novel cognitive-decision perspective on L2 classroom interaction and provides empirical and theoretical grounds for task and assessment design.</abstract>
            <keywords>foreign language learners,classroom oral performance,risk aversion,reference-point dependence,prospect theory,language proficiency</keywords>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61360/BoniCETR262020690903</article-id>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <tbody>
        <back>
            <sec/>
            <ref-list>
                <ref>
                   <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                       <p>Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.&#13;
Dewaele, J.-M. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 523–535.&#13;
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei &amp; E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters.&#13;
Elliot, A. J., &amp; Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804–818.&#13;
Gałajda, D. (2017). Communicative behavior of a language learner: Exploring willingness to communicate. Springer.&#13;
Hiver, P., &amp; Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Multilingual Matters.&#13;
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., &amp; Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.&#13;
Hu, L. T., &amp; Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.&#13;
Jackson, J. (2024). Language and intercultural communication in the new era. Routledge.&#13;
Kahneman, D., &amp; Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.&#13;
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.&#13;
Li, C. (2024). Teacher feedback and learner perception in the Chinese EFL classroom: A dynamic interaction. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 45–63.&#13;
Liu, H. G. (2022). A study on reference points of Chinese college students’ engagement in English learning: Types, influences and interventions. Foreign Language Circles, (3), 45–52.&#13;
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., &amp; Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.&#13;
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A. V., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., &amp; Jiang, C. (2019). Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2×2 model of L2 self-guides. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 337–361.&#13;
Wang, D. (2021). A study on classroom silence of foreign language learners from the perspective of L2 motivational self system. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (2), 56–64.&#13;
Wen, Q. F. (2014). The output-driven and input-contributing hypothesis: An attempt to construct a college foreign language classroom teaching theory. Foreign Language Circles, (2), 1–12.&#13;
Wen, Z. (2018). Empowerment: A new approach to foreign language classroom teaching reform. Foreign Languages, 34(3), 1–7.&#13;
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., &amp; Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Sage Publications.&#13;
Xu, J. F., &amp; Kou, J. N. (2017). Research on the relationship between college foreign language classroom learning environment and learners' willingness to communicate in oral English. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (2), 39–49.&#13;
Xu, J. F., &amp; Nie, R. (2020). Hotspots, trends and prospects of foreign language education psychology research. Frontiers of Foreign Language Education Research, 3(3), 47–54.&#13;
Zhang, L. J., &amp; Rahimi, M. (2023). EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in class: The role of task framing and perceived classroom climate. System, 112, 102956.</p>
                   </element-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </tbody>
</article>