<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Contemporary Education and Teaching Research</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn media_type="print">2737-4203</issn>
            <issn media_type="electronic">2737-4335</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>BONI FUTURE DIGITAL PUBLISHING CO.,LIMITED</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
            <url>https://ojs.bonfuturepress.com/index.php/CETR/article/view/2015</url>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <issue></issue>
            <year>2026</year>
            <published-time>2026-06-18</published-time>
            <title>Structured Reflection for Durable Learning in Higher Education: An Integrative Review Building the SIRR Framework</title>
            <author>Navarro Maria*</author>
            <abstract>This integrative review reconceptualizes reflection as a generative meta‑mechanism that supports durable learning, principled transfer, and coherent knowledge development in higher education. Drawing on classical and experiential accounts of reflection alongside evidence from the learning sciences, the review synthesizes research on retrieval practice, elaboration and self‑explanation, interleaved discrimination, contextualization, and metacognitively supported self‑regulation. The synthesis introduces SIRR (Spaced Interleaved Reflective Retrieval), a design‑oriented framework that coordinates these mechanisms through brief, recurring reflective prompts embedded within ongoing instruction. Rather than treating reflection as an unstructured or purely introspective activity, SIRR conceptualizes reflection as a structured process that activates memory, supports conceptual integration, and improves learners’ ability to select and apply appropriate knowledge across situations. Evidence from across domains suggests that these mechanisms, when combined in short and distributed learning episodes, improve delayed performance, strengthen discrimination among similar concepts, and promote a more coherent understanding of how content connects across contexts and over time. The paper contributes a theoretically grounded and designable account of reflection and positions SIRR as a compact, research‑aligned framework for enhancing learning in conceptually dense and interdisciplinary higher education environments.</abstract>
            <keywords>structured reflection,retrieval practice,interleaving,metacognition,higher education</keywords>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61360/BoniCETRHE262020150101</article-id>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <tbody>
        <back>
            <sec/>
            <ref-list>
                <ref>
                   <element-citation publication-type="journal">
                       <p>Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., &amp; Blunt, J. R. (2021). Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1409–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9&#13;
Asterhan, C. S. C., &amp; Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626&#13;
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe &amp; A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.&#13;
Bjork, R. A. (2011). On the symbiosis of remembering, forgetting, and learning. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 1–22). Psychology Press.&#13;
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., &amp; Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix &amp; R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.&#13;
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., &amp; Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032&#13;
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., &amp; LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3&#13;
Credé, M., Roch, S. G., &amp; Kieszczynka, U. M. (2010). Class attendance in college: A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310362998&#13;
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., &amp; Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116&#13;
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., &amp; Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783&#13;
Donoghue, G. M., &amp; Hattie, J. A. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of ten learning techniques. Frontiers in Education, 6, 581216. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.581216&#13;
Dunlosky, J., &amp; Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. SAGE.&#13;
Dunlosky, J., &amp; Rawson, K. A. (2015). Practice tests, spaced practice, and successive relearning: Tips for classroom use and for guiding students’ learning. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000024&#13;
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &amp; Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111&#13;
Gershman, S., Hausmann, R. G. M., Nokes, T. J., &amp; VanLehn, K. (2009). The design of self-explanation prompts: The fit hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2626–2631). Cognitive Science Society.&#13;
Gezer-Templeton, P. G., Mayhew, E. J., Korte, D. S., &amp; Schmidt, S. J. (2017). Use of exam wrappers to enhance students’ metacognitive skills in a large introductory food science and human nutrition course. Journal of Food Science Education, 16, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4329.12103&#13;
Hamilton, R. (2012). Elaboration effects on learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1103–1105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_170&#13;
Hartwig, M. K., &amp; Malain, E. D. (2022). Do students space their course study? Those who do earn higher grades. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101538&#13;
Hartwig, M. K., Rohrer, D., &amp; Dedrick, R. F. (2022). Scheduling math practice: Students’ underappreciation of spacing and interleaving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000391&#13;
Hatton, N., &amp; Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U&#13;
Hidi, S., &amp; Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4&#13;
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., &amp; Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442&#13;
King, P. M., &amp; Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass.&#13;
King, P. M., &amp; Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2&#13;
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson.&#13;
Lang, J. M. (2021). Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of learning. Jossey-Bass.&#13;
Mann, K., Gordon, J., &amp; MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2&#13;
Nicol, D. J., &amp; Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090&#13;
Pieschl, S. (2008). Metacognitive calibration—An extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9030-4&#13;
Rawson, K. A., &amp; Dunlosky, J. (2013). Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030498&#13;
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181&#13;
Roediger, H. L., III, &amp; Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x&#13;
Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., Hartwig, M. K., &amp; Cheung, C.-N. (2020). A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000367&#13;
Sampson, V., &amp; Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276&#13;
Smith, A. M., Floerke, V. A., &amp; Thomas, A. K. (2016). Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Science, 354(6315), 1046–1048. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5067&#13;
Taylor, K., &amp; Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1598&#13;
Tobler, S., &amp; Kapur, M. (2023). Metacognitive calibration: A methodological expansion and empirical application. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2023) (pp. 3–10). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000600979&#13;
Toronto, C. E., &amp; Remington, R. (Eds.). (2020). A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1&#13;
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283&#13;
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606&#13;
Whittemore, R., &amp; Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x&#13;
Zheng, X., Ma, Y., Yue, T., &amp; Yang, X. (2023). Effects of different types of cues and self-explanation prompts in instructional videos on deep learning: Evidence from multiple data analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 807–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10188-2&#13;
Zhu, L., Huang, E., Defazio, J., &amp; Hook, S. A. (2019). Impact of the stringency of attendance policies on class attendance/participation and course grades. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i1.23717</p>
                   </element-citation>
                </ref>
            </ref-list>
        </back>
    </tbody>
</article>